THE RELATIONSHIP OF EMPLOYEE POTENTIAL, EMPLOYEE COMPETENCE AND WORK MOTIVATION WITH PERFORMANCE OF EMPLOYEES IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AND PEOPLE'S HOUSING DEPARTMENT JAMBI PROVINCE

Authors

  • Ellyta Mona State Islamic University of Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Ahmad Syukri State Islamic University of Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Risnita Risnita State Islamic University of Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/ijemr.v1i2.49

Keywords:

Employee Potential, Employee Competence, Work Motivation, Employee Performance

Abstract

This study aims to test the hypothesis of the relationship between potential, employee competence and work motivation with employee performance at the Public Works and Public Housing (PUPR) Jambi Province. This research is a quantitative research with survey method. The sampling technique used a probability sampling technique with a sample size of 42 PUPR employees. Hypothesis testing using correlation analysis with a significance level of = 0.05. Data Result This research concludes that either partially or simultaneously there are: 1). There is a direct relationship between employee potential (X1) and Employee Performance (Y) with a correlation coefficient of 0.73. 2) a direct relationship between employee competence (X2) and employee performance (Y) with a correlation coefficient of 0.83. 3) a direct relationship between work motivation (X3) and employee performance (Y) with a correlation coefficient of 0.53. 4) there is a simultaneous direct relationship between employee potential (X1), employee competence (X2), and work motivation (X3) with employee performance (Y) , with an Fcount of 68.89 and Ftable of 4.01 with a correlation coefficient (Rx1x2x3Y ) of 0.883. The implication of this research is that based on the results of the analysis, it is known that from the two structural models studied, in the first model, namely employee performance as an endogenous variable, competence is the dominant factor that affects employee performance when compared to work motivation. In structural model 2 which places employee potential as an endogenous variable, it is known that employee performance is the dominant factor, then competence and finally work motivation. Based on these findings, the priority of improving employee performance can be done through increasing potential, employee competence and work motivation.

 

References

Abd. Kadim Masaong dan Arfan A. Tilome, Kepemimpinan Berbasis Multiple Intelligence (Sinergi Kecerdasan Intelektual, Emosional dan Spiritual untuk Meraih Kesuksesan yang Gemilang). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011.

Agus Irianto, Statistik; Konsep Dasar, Aplikasi, adan Pengembangannya. Jakarta: Kencana, 2015.

Agus Wibowo, Akuntabilitas Pendidikan; Upaya Meningkatkan Mutu dan Citra Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2013.

A Khalik, A A Musyaffa, M. Fadhil , Employee Engagement Lecturer UIN STS Jambi,

Anas Sudijono, Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.

Artana.I Ketut. (2009). Analisis Kinerja Pegawai. Versi elektronik. Diakses dari : eprints.undip.ac.id/17673/1/I ketut artana.pdf, pada 15 April 2018.

Ary Ginanjar Agustian, Rahasia Sukses Membangun Kecerdasan Emosi dan Spiritual ESQ. Jakarta:

Arga, 2005. Bernardus sandjaja, pengantar membangun teori penelitian merajut kesangsian menggapai kebenaran, Jakarta, Prestasi Pustaka, 2015,

Bober, J. Marcie., TheChallenges of Instructional Accountability. Tech Trends Journal. Volume 48. No 4, 2004.

Colquitt Jason A., LePine Jeffery A., and Wesson Michael J., Op. Cit.. 258 Currie, Jan dan Huisman, Jeroen. Accountability in higher education: Bridge over troubled water? Higher Education Journal.volume 48. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands, 2004.

Deni Darmawan, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif.Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2013.

Departemen Agama RI, Akuntabilitas dan Good Governance.Jakarta: Sekretariat jenderal Biro organisasi dan tatalaksana, 2006.

E. Mulyasa, Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah Konsep Strategi dan Implementasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2012.

E. Mulyasa, Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru, (Bandung:PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011)

Edy Sutrisno, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia,cetakan ke-4 (Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2012)

Ernie Tisnawati Sule dan Kurniawan Saefullah, Pengantar Manajemen. Jakarta: Kencana, 2006.

Evi Syaefini Shaleha, “Pengambilan Keputusan Partisipatif dalam Implementasi Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah” dalam Disertasi (Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2008.

Fatah Syukur, Manajemen Pendidikan Berbasis pada Madrasah.Semarang: Pustaka Rizki Putra, 2011. Fred, Luthans., Organizational behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2011

Glenda Lappan, Sample and Population: Data and Statistics, (New Jersey: Pearson Pretince Hall, 2007)

Goleman, Daniel., Emotional Intelligence; Mengapa EI Lebih Penting daripada IQ.Terj. T. Hermaya,Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka utama, 2014.

Griffin, Ricky W., Organizational Behavior. Boston: Houghton Miffin, 1986.

Gunawan, M. Ali. (2013). hal.100 Statistik untuk Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing

Hamidah Sulaiman, dkk., “Kecerdasan Emosi Menurut Al-Quran dan AlSunnah: Aplikasinya dalam Membentuk Akhlak Remaja” dalam The Online Journal of Islamic Education,Vol. 1 Issue 2, Malaysia: University Malaya, 2013.

Handy, C. B. Understanding Organizations, fourth edition, Penguin Books 1993, p. 15. Dalam Laurie J. Mullins, Management & Organisational Behaviour Ninth Edition. Husaini Usman, Manajemen Teori, Praktik dan Riset Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2010.

Husaini Usman, Manajemen: Teori, Praktik, dan Riset Pendidikan, (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2010)

Ibn Katsir, Tafsir Ibnu Katsir, terjemahan Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Abdurrahman bin Ishaq al-Sheikh. Bogor: Pustaka Imam Syafi’i, 2009.

Imam Abdul Fida Isma’il Ibnu Kasit Ad-Dimasyqi, Tafsir Ibnu Katsir, terjemahan. Bahrun Abu Bakar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo, 2009.

Indra Bastian, Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen Sektor Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2014.

Irham Fahmi, Teori dan Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan: Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2016

J. Mullins, Laurie, Management and Organisational Behaviour. London: Prentice Hall, 2005.

Jason A. Colquitt, J, Lepine, Micheal J.Wessom, Organizational Behavior Improving Performance and Comimitment in the Workplace, (USA: McGraw-Hiill Education, 2015).

Jeni Wulandari, dkk, Identifikasi kompetensi manajerial pada level manajemen menengah dalam industri perbankan Indonesia, Jurnal Siast Bisnis Vo. 22 No. 1 2008, 20-37

JokoSubagyo, Metode Penelitian Dalam Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2004.

Juliansyah Noor, Metodologi Penelitian: Sripsi, Tesis, Disertasi, dan Karya Ilmiah. Jakarta: Kencana, 2013. Kadarisman, Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2013)

Downloads

Published

2022-08-28

How to Cite

Ellyta Mona, Ahmad Syukri, & Risnita, R. (2022). THE RELATIONSHIP OF EMPLOYEE POTENTIAL, EMPLOYEE COMPETENCE AND WORK MOTIVATION WITH PERFORMANCE OF EMPLOYEES IN THE PUBLIC WORKS AND PEOPLE’S HOUSING DEPARTMENT JAMBI PROVINCE. International Journal of Economics and Management Research, 1(2), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.55606/ijemr.v1i2.49

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.